Showing posts with label fathers4justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fathers4justice. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2011

If you think feminism is bad, you should check out patriachy...



Feminism in all its simplicity, is about womens rights. Some have skewed the argument and made stupid claims about what they believe it is. Lazy women who dont want to work(or do anything at all), often use the feminists of the past as something to blame for all their problems. Women who have spent their entire life consumed by men are often brainwashed into whatever political ideals he has, all in the name of gaining his affections(please see: "He's Not That Into You" for further reading). Men subjected to intervention orders, most often because there was a need for it to be in place, have created their own mythological tale on what they believe feminism to be. Some are psychopaths who have in their worklife, bullied their way to the top of the corperate ladder, used to going home to their perfect victim. They have a masterful tale on what they believe feminism is. In fact, these types are so driven and obsessed at changing the structures itself to purport these fanciful notions on what feminism is in their sadistic mind. Compulsive liars, that comes with the title, would have you believe that any women that stands against a mans right to beat her senseless and have her body removed without a whisper is a god given right. Such types would probably go to lengths to even create a religion out of it...whoops, they already have.
In reality, they would never say to you straight out, "I want the right to rape, beat, murder and do what I please to women". There are too many humanists out there that would be outraged. So tact is the game of these losers whom seek sadism as a source of pleasure at the cost of womens human rights. The perhaps, less educated tend to ask why not address all human beings at once in protecting rights for that not to happen to them. Racism and slavery towards african americans continued well beyond the signing of the declaration of human rights. In order to deal with the issue that targets a particular group of people, the group needs to be acknowledged. One needs to think what might have happened had everyone simply referred to generalising the issue on slavery and racism and if anything at all might have been resolved. There were various tricks and tactics to condone violence, slavery and other horrific aspects towards these people and no different to the experience of attacks towards women today. Whilst laws significently clarify that such acts are illegal, often perpetrators of racism attacked subversively. eg. Klu Klux Klan and white power(comparable to black shirts or Fathers for justice groups. Their lobbying is skewed and attracts media attention to provoke hatred and incite the same type of violence towards women. One tactic, is to abscond with the children or use court orders to inhibit her freedom of movement and dictate her daily routine as so she will give in and return to him. Some have been known to use the children by attacking them over the phone, so that the mother will comply in distress to the childs screams.
Further subversive lobby groups, have managed to formulate laws to impinge on the evidence gathering and prevent victims from being able to speak of these crimes. Throughout history, there have always been tyrants, but lesser acknowledged are the ones who repeatedly attack those in the home and justify it as a "right". For as long as women and children are targeted, there is a need to protect them, monitor the laws that are harming them and ensure that they can thrive in the international community as any other fellow human being. That is the heart of feminism and deep down everyone knows that women and children deserve it. They both deserve to be respected and not harmed emotionally, socially, physically and systematically. They deserve to live above the poverty line with dignity and freedom as any other person enjoys. Naturally children are acknowledged here, simply because mothers; the least voiced amongst feminists are always thinking of them and wanting to see their rights realised too.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

How Angry Men's Groups Exploit Grieving Families

A lot of murders go unreported or lack details that would impinge on the Men's rights rhetoric. I cannot speak for the families that have suffered directly their own loss, I can only recognise the unwritten code of what is and isn't appropriate to do in the wake of mourning. I can say that being decent, respectful and compassionate is an expectation in any grieving circumstances.

Men's Groups have relied upon success at the detriment of women and children. They were ruthless in their relentless pursuit to own the lives and deaths of children and their mothers without what they consider "interference of government". Current family court laws are a deep reflection of that. The news reports, political alliances of some journalists and the overzealous power of the courts to choose what is reported, what isn't and most importantly how they are reported. Even some scholarly work is left out of family matters.

It was only in the past two years that NSW implemented a domestic violence homicide review board and shortly after that men's rights groups all of a sudden began to interfere with NSW legislation on how homicides are investigated introducing clauses where Families have more power to decide how the investigations are conducted under the guise of "male suicide" . "Families" includes the partner and thus defeats investigating deaths characterised by non forensic investigation as "unsuspecting" including death by strangulation. Therefore, in short Husbands have the legal authority to murder their wives or children as long as it is in a way that is not openly suspicious. They have the legal authority to bar forensic investigation that would otherwise detect deeper findings such as strangulation.

In cases where the media is able to or does report deaths related to family violence, men's groups attempt to either twist the circumstances to suit their agenda, exaggerating findings or argue that the death was irrelevant, especially when the death clearly demonstrates that their agenda would draw upon more cases if their agenda was achieved.

Indecency

On the Forum discussion for Four corners on a murder-suicide where there was a history of domestic violence and the Family Court awarded unsupervised time with him subsequently resulted in the deaths of three little children, "Justice4Fathers" makes the following statement:

From: Justuce4Fathers 16/08/2004 9:46:15 PM
Subject: If 50/50 was ordered, would the kids be alive? post id: 147
of course they would.
when you make the children 'booty of war' then they are directly in the firing line.

Interesting to note that before the family court came into being, these cases were UNHEARD OF.

There are a lot of deaths on the family courts dorrstep, mothers, fathers and sadly children.

stop the evil NOW


Disrespect

Despite news reports at the time of the post clearly stating that the mother was cleared over the deaths of her three young sons being due to a faulty heater, a Senior user of the dads on air forum stated the following:

Aussie Firestorm
Snr. Registered User
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 2126
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:25 am Post subject:
What is extremely concerning is the number of reports of mothers killing their children over the last 3 years.

For every one report I read about the father being the perpetrator, I read 3 or 4 where the perpertrator is the mother!

And who normally takes the children on seperation? The mother ... then children die.

When is the government going to wake up, reject feminist propaganda and protect the children from the main perpetrators of child homicide?


A face book page was started that continued with disinformation that the mother was responsible for the deaths even though she was cleared.

Devoid of Compassion

In an article by fathers4justice, commentary on Arthur freeman who has been charged for murder where over100 witnessed him throw his five year old daughter off Melbourne west gate bridge not only sympathised with Arthur Freeman, but also implied that the mother could have done something to stop it.

Yes, Arthur Freeman who must be in a living hell, not just stuck in jail for ever and a day, but having to live with the pain and negative emotions for all eternity, having did what he regrettably did, in the spur of the moment. Wrong place at the wrong time. The stress upon this poor father must have been horrendous for him to have performed such a thoughtless act. Most people who have been up against it with barbaric authorities know the immense pressure one can be under, and everyone knows, it only takes a second for a person to snap.


And then this...

The mother, who is also living a different type of hell must be regretting ever setting foot in a lawyer's office, let alone being induced into going to the Family Court. I'm sure in hindsight she would have done things different if it meant having her darling Darcey still with her.


The underlying tone here of course is if they resolved it out of court aka if the mother just submitted to all demands, then things would be somehow better.

Internet References:

Visibility, Responsibility and Identity in Domestic Murder-Suicide

4corners Forum

Dads on the Air Forum:

Gas leak killed boys at home, mother cleared

Facebook gossip upsets dead boys' family

Who is responsible for Darcey Freeman's Death?

Coroner Reform Welcomed By Rev Nile